vistachiri
Dalayan Master
So wait, rampage hits the top 3...and in an 18 man format...rampage is not hitting the main tank now?...But it's going to now if there aren't 3 people on the mob to soak the rampage..? So raids that actually want to fit this are going to have 2 of one of the kinds of tank? Seeing as pets don't rt worth a damm this would leave the apparent "ideal" format:
1 Warr
2 SK
3 Pal
4 (*War sk pal)
5 Monk
6 Rogue
7 Cleric
8 Druid
9 Shaman
10 Bard
11 Beastlord
12 Wizard
13 Mage
14 Enchanter
15 Necro
16 Ranger
"Fortune Favors the Diverse" thread being used to determine an ideal of course, with other "Tanking" class marked with a * in order to designate their slot.
Leaving 2 slots and further limiting raids? Not of course to mention in an 18 format such as this the last 2 spots are going to be healers if you're talking about having the rampage tanks. On 36 man yeah theres enough to go around. On 18? It sounds like a terrible idea. I don't see a chance in hell of having enough healers in and still actually keeping all of those up. But I digress, back to what this thread is actually about: i.e. Mages rather than a discussion on rampage tanking..
@Ryei a normal pet without the buffs mages themselves get, is not that bad. In fact, our 2 longest waittimed petspells (Bop & Sop) I've noticed approximately 0 difference in pet dps. Leaving you with regular runeswords/daggers, a bauble of battle (which I also have yet to notice a difference with), burnout, ds and if you really really want to get extravagant Til's (and of course talok's if soloing). All of which don't really take any time. Rebuffing the pet with aego/focus bots. That's the part that sucks. If it goes by pet health too it may actually be a decent reason to buff the pet. While still not being overpowered, as it would be pretty difficult for it to get as powerful as manaburn/lifefire.
1 Warr
2 SK
3 Pal
4 (*War sk pal)
5 Monk
6 Rogue
7 Cleric
8 Druid
9 Shaman
10 Bard
11 Beastlord
12 Wizard
13 Mage
14 Enchanter
15 Necro
16 Ranger
"Fortune Favors the Diverse" thread being used to determine an ideal of course, with other "Tanking" class marked with a * in order to designate their slot.
Leaving 2 slots and further limiting raids? Not of course to mention in an 18 format such as this the last 2 spots are going to be healers if you're talking about having the rampage tanks. On 36 man yeah theres enough to go around. On 18? It sounds like a terrible idea. I don't see a chance in hell of having enough healers in and still actually keeping all of those up. But I digress, back to what this thread is actually about: i.e. Mages rather than a discussion on rampage tanking..
@Ryei a normal pet without the buffs mages themselves get, is not that bad. In fact, our 2 longest waittimed petspells (Bop & Sop) I've noticed approximately 0 difference in pet dps. Leaving you with regular runeswords/daggers, a bauble of battle (which I also have yet to notice a difference with), burnout, ds and if you really really want to get extravagant Til's (and of course talok's if soloing). All of which don't really take any time. Rebuffing the pet with aego/focus bots. That's the part that sucks. If it goes by pet health too it may actually be a decent reason to buff the pet. While still not being overpowered, as it would be pretty difficult for it to get as powerful as manaburn/lifefire.