Tempus said:Feel free to petition any name you think violates the policy.
I petitioned a name recently and was told not to do it again
Tempus said:Feel free to petition any name you think violates the policy.
calaran said:Hah, yeah... I won't be doing that. It doesn't really ruin my experience to see those sorts of names around, was just making a point that there are far worse names out there than what has been nerfed in the past, hence peoples' feelings of discrepancy.
Goatface said:I petitioned a name recently and was told not to do it again
rab said:3. Name changes. We cannot change names upon request.
3b. Name nerfs need to be in a concise fashion. /petition the charname and why you feel it should be changed. Doing so out of spite or with a lame reason will get you jailed.
Yup. Sent the email on September 25th. Since then I've been trying to figure out if either nothing will get done(or explained!), or Wiz just...doesn't care.Draxx said:In my experience, it's insanely difficult to get ahold of wiz to get a last word, especially for something like this. Brimz and Finster sent him an Email about the Chaseum situation almost a month ago, and there has been no response.
Tempus said:We are volunteers, and there are not enough of us to police every name 24/7. We like to take some time out and enjoy the game ourselves occasionally. So really it is just you being shitty. We can only fix what we are aware of.
calaran said:Cool. I'm glad we've resorted to personal attacks. I believe, if you cared to at all, if you looked for posts by me in the past (all made basically AFTER that name nerf which happened a long time ago) I've always been very supportive of the admins, gms, etc... and I'm not taking to attacking you guys now, I was just pointing something out. I understand that you like to play as well and want to relax... I understand that well, as a coder on a mud. It's not just me being crappy... it was me pointing out a name to show what gives people a sense of inconsistency -- I HIGHLY doubt that no gm has ever been in a party, guild or raid with Meso, and as such they have been aware of his name at some point. I'm not going to ruin someone else's name choice just because 'I should'. I didn't point that name out because I want it changed. I'm not complaining because it hasn't been changed. Heck, I don't even THINK I am complaining that my old name was changed... I don't care and have said as much. Honestly, I'd rather have "Mewmew Purrypaws" running around because I ignore idiots like that and they don't hurt my play at all... but it's not my sandbox.
I appreciate what you guys do here a lot; I just think some of the naming stuff is a bit silly and joined in on the conversation. I didn't realize that was opening myself to your comment(s). I fully expect another "you're just being <expletive omitted>" or whatever post as I've evidently hit some sorta nerve.
On a side note, I think it's funny that people (and I wholly include myself in this) expect some sort of different standard of behavior from admin/gm type positions in online communities... they're people too and just like the rest of us, can misread something, take offense to something not meant to offend, or just in general be a jerk... never surprises me unless the tag under their name links them to the staff... then I'm always taken aback for a second.
Anyway, as Jonny Blaze from the Fantastic 4 says, "FLAME ON!"
Brimztone said:I just wish there was a way to actually file complaints with the naming policy in general. At least to get a "Sorry but no." response instead of nothing for over a month.
Cunha said:I dont even know if real names are allowed according to the rules. Can my name be Richard? So long as I dont hit level 20 and make my last name to Gere is that a legitimate name? I can see that name being nerfed, but I dont think it should be, or even be at risk. What about Non - stupid word names? Or can a name not exist in an english dictionary?
Naming policy
1. Titles
No titles. You can't be "Lordgrey" or "Jackthegreat". Sorry.
2. Stupid or Well-Known Names
No names from well-known, popular media. You can't be Aragorn, Gandalf or Garfield.
On that note, no unrealistic or completely idiotic names either. "Rogue" or "Iksar" are not acceptable names.
3. Wordplays and Wordmeshes
No wordplays. "Froak Frog" is not an acceptable name, nor is Frog or Froak by itself, but those go under
idiotic names anyway. In the same avenue, no combine-word names. You can't be Rockjumper or Swordswinger
or Deathdancer. These are acceptable last names, but not acceptable first names.
4. Gibberish Go Away
Your name must be something resembling a name. You can't be Xbaihjsfa, Qwwwwb or
otherwise have a name with no wovels like Fgbnm or Xfds.
5. The Linguistic Lambada
Cleverly bypassing the naming policy by using a different language, spelling it differently/backwards
or using an obvious anagram will not win you any sympathy points. We will still change your name when we find out.
6. Kooky Combinations
If you create a pair of characters with names that carry an obvious meaning together, or form a word play
together (for example Louise and Thelma) they will be changed even if the individual names do not violate policy.
This rule does not apply to simply having two similarily named characters, such as Ling and Leng or Ling and Gnil.
7. Even Then!
That "you used this name on live" does not mean it magically bypasses the policy. We will not tolerate this excuse.
Use the rules here, not the non-existant name rules on EQlive.
8. Spirit of the Law
Finally, the rules above are a guideline for staffers, not an absolute set of rules, so use common sense and try
to follow the spirit of the law. If you feel your name has been unjustly changed, send an email
to [email][email protected][/email] stating your case.
aw man, you broke the threadTempus said:breakage
Thinkmeats said:If you can come up with a way to include appeals in the system without causing a shit-ton of unecessary work, by all means post it.
All I am saying is when Finster and I talk to a GM, then an Admin to get permission to email Wiz himself about it, send the email, and hear nothing about it for over a month, I'm not really sure what can be done about it if it's in Wiz' hands and he just doesn't respond at all. Not even with a "No."Tempus said:Look if you feel unjustly nerfed there is a mechanism in place for you to appeal it.
Brimztone said:All I am saying is when Finster and I talk to a GM, then an Admin to get permission to email Wiz himself about it, send the email, and hear nothing about it for over a month, I'm not really sure what can be done about it if it's in Wiz' hands and he just doesn't respond at all. Not even with a "No."
I realize he is a volunteer and he runs the server out of the goodness of his heart(and we love him for it) but when a GM says sure just email Wiz, and you do, and nothing happens, maybe there should be another route to take. Again, I am not sure what that alternate route could be. It's just really odd to be told yeah do this and by doing that nothing happens.
Draxx said:dumb shit like this
Thinkmeats said:Most GMs treat it as a necessary duty akin to taking out the trash
Draxx said:Quoting this for awesomeness.
What I don't get is why WIZ has to have the last word on dumb shit like this. As lead GM, does Allielyn have zero oversight on this? Can she not make a binding decision of "well, I think that I can handle the naming policy for now"?
I firmly believe that if you have a complaint then you should take it up with someone in charge. That someone has to be wiz, but he's not really around to take care of little things like your name, so you go to the next in charge. That's either Dynak or Allielyn, or even Xeldan if the two of them aren't around. If Wiz were around more in IRC or otherwise maybe it would be a different story. But I think something needs to be changed and someone who's around more needs to take care of things like this.