Rorne
The sad fish is a reactionary creature; an enemy o
Hello and sorry in advance to the devs. The point of this thread is for players to bring to light game issues they feel have been unnoticed or overlooked up until this point, I mean topic-wise it is pretty open but if you come into this thread and you're like "X class is better than my class cause I am an imbecile and here is some hyperbole" I will descend upon you like.. well, think of the cover of Bat out of Hell but I'm way more imposing than Meatloaf and also I guess I'm going downwards instead of upwards. Basically I will just kill you
if you post your dumb shit in this thread. You people know who you are.
Now lets get down to business
ENCHANTER
Blissful Apathy (enc 52)
Mana cost:130
Cast time:2.5 seconds
Resist adjust: -25
Duration: 16 ticks
Effect: Mez up to level 60
VS
Glamour of Kintaz (enc 54)
Mana cost:125
Cast time:2.5 seconds
Resist adjust: -10
Duration: 9 ticks
Effect: Mez up to level 56
I imagine an innocent enchanter buying up his level 54 spells. Glamour of Kintaz is scribed and he begins casting it, suddenly his eyes widen and he begins to bleed out of every orifice - finally melting into a steaming pile goo as the paradox of a spell from two levels earlier being superior in every way hits him. Really the only thing Glamour of Kintaz has going for it is that it's 5 less mana and has a name that wasn't picked by a teenage goth.
BEASTLORD
Yekan's Recovery (bst 39)
Mana cost:125
Cast time:3 seconds
Range: 100
Effect: heal for 580(L39) to 583(L40), Decrease disease counter by 10
VS
Aid of Khurenz (bst 52)
Mana cost:125
Cast time:2.5 seconds
Range: 200
Effect: heal for 434(L52) to 437(L59), Decrease disease counter by 10
This one is a not as solid a case. Here we have two spells with a 12 level divide on the same cooldown. The main benefit of the successor Aid of Khurenz is the half a second less cast time and double the range. Now is this enough to make up for doing 146 less raw hp in healing? Well that is a great question and I am glad you asked me because no, I really don't think so, but since we're not operating on just opinions in this thread you can crunch the numbers and see that by cast 3 Yekan's begins to overtake Aid really making it a headscratcher why a spell 12 levels later is performing so poorly.
Reagents
Oh reagents. We've probably all used spells that take reagents. You want to cast aegolism on your traek alt so you can get him his 200th AA but first you have to go through the painful process of obtaining the peridots. So you stomp your feet as you load up some mage from god knows where and you completely bypass a real stupid obstacle that is completely trivial to anyone that has mage info or is really good at harassing a mage online. So I have to ask. What-is-the-point-of-reagents. I can understand the point before the prevalence of summoned peridots (I guess...) but this is a strange new world that has utterly and completely trivialized the point of peridots being a reagent for anything and honestly I have to ask, what the hell was the point of spells having reagents in the first place other than for players to be minimally inconvenienced or to maybe plop down a little cash just so they can utilize a part of their class. Pet reagents were done away with and now it's time to be brave and go all the way for a bunch of other spells.
Monk weight penalty
Lets dive right into this one. What's the point. Load up the wiki, look at monk gear weight (I don't care about your wyrmhide, you turd), minimize that page, reread "What's the point" and nod. Beyond the exception of very few instances a monk does not have to forego gear to come in under weight because past a point all the good stuff is lighter than those 80s aerobic dumbbells they marketed to women. If there were trade-offs I could understand it still being around. I'm sure the reason there aren't is due to in part the fact that people who play monks are horrible human beings and also stuff like that pofrost helm thread - but the point stands that the weight limit is a non-issue for anything other than carrying cash or maybe looting in a group WHICH IS RIDICULOUS and I am at a loss to understand why, with that knowledge in hand, we are keeping that dirty little vestigial feature around when all it does is enforce a vow of poverty outside a bank and an obsession with weight reducing bags.
Anyways, go forth and post with logic and reason fellow players.
EDIT: ALSO if you want to argue with a guy for 11 posts about how wrong he is, don't do it here on my turf
if you post your dumb shit in this thread. You people know who you are.
Now lets get down to business
ENCHANTER
Blissful Apathy (enc 52)
Mana cost:130
Cast time:2.5 seconds
Resist adjust: -25
Duration: 16 ticks
Effect: Mez up to level 60
VS
Glamour of Kintaz (enc 54)
Mana cost:125
Cast time:2.5 seconds
Resist adjust: -10
Duration: 9 ticks
Effect: Mez up to level 56
I imagine an innocent enchanter buying up his level 54 spells. Glamour of Kintaz is scribed and he begins casting it, suddenly his eyes widen and he begins to bleed out of every orifice - finally melting into a steaming pile goo as the paradox of a spell from two levels earlier being superior in every way hits him. Really the only thing Glamour of Kintaz has going for it is that it's 5 less mana and has a name that wasn't picked by a teenage goth.
BEASTLORD
Yekan's Recovery (bst 39)
Mana cost:125
Cast time:3 seconds
Range: 100
Effect: heal for 580(L39) to 583(L40), Decrease disease counter by 10
VS
Aid of Khurenz (bst 52)
Mana cost:125
Cast time:2.5 seconds
Range: 200
Effect: heal for 434(L52) to 437(L59), Decrease disease counter by 10
This one is a not as solid a case. Here we have two spells with a 12 level divide on the same cooldown. The main benefit of the successor Aid of Khurenz is the half a second less cast time and double the range. Now is this enough to make up for doing 146 less raw hp in healing? Well that is a great question and I am glad you asked me because no, I really don't think so, but since we're not operating on just opinions in this thread you can crunch the numbers and see that by cast 3 Yekan's begins to overtake Aid really making it a headscratcher why a spell 12 levels later is performing so poorly.
Reagents
Oh reagents. We've probably all used spells that take reagents. You want to cast aegolism on your traek alt so you can get him his 200th AA but first you have to go through the painful process of obtaining the peridots. So you stomp your feet as you load up some mage from god knows where and you completely bypass a real stupid obstacle that is completely trivial to anyone that has mage info or is really good at harassing a mage online. So I have to ask. What-is-the-point-of-reagents. I can understand the point before the prevalence of summoned peridots (I guess...) but this is a strange new world that has utterly and completely trivialized the point of peridots being a reagent for anything and honestly I have to ask, what the hell was the point of spells having reagents in the first place other than for players to be minimally inconvenienced or to maybe plop down a little cash just so they can utilize a part of their class. Pet reagents were done away with and now it's time to be brave and go all the way for a bunch of other spells.
Monk weight penalty
Lets dive right into this one. What's the point. Load up the wiki, look at monk gear weight (I don't care about your wyrmhide, you turd), minimize that page, reread "What's the point" and nod. Beyond the exception of very few instances a monk does not have to forego gear to come in under weight because past a point all the good stuff is lighter than those 80s aerobic dumbbells they marketed to women. If there were trade-offs I could understand it still being around. I'm sure the reason there aren't is due to in part the fact that people who play monks are horrible human beings and also stuff like that pofrost helm thread - but the point stands that the weight limit is a non-issue for anything other than carrying cash or maybe looting in a group WHICH IS RIDICULOUS and I am at a loss to understand why, with that knowledge in hand, we are keeping that dirty little vestigial feature around when all it does is enforce a vow of poverty outside a bank and an obsession with weight reducing bags.
Anyways, go forth and post with logic and reason fellow players.
EDIT: ALSO if you want to argue with a guy for 11 posts about how wrong he is, don't do it here on my turf
Last edited: