ElPapaPollo
Dalayan Beginner
Thinkmeats said:You're doing 333-500 sustained dps? That's quite a lot.
At least 298 dps without crits. The 3k a tick is very rare for me, like I said, so I don't reach 500 dps much.
Thinkmeats said:You're doing 333-500 sustained dps? That's quite a lot.
ElPapaPollo said:At least 298 dps without crits. The 3k a tick is very rare for me, like I said, so I don't reach 500 dps much.
Thinkmeats said:400 AA rogues with IP/thaz loot parse at about 325 against weak-ish trash, so you can understand my surprise. How long can you sustain that?
Hasrett said:4) I highly doubt you've done 3k per tick more than a couple of ticks EVER, given how fast the poison dots wear off and the fact that you'd need both of them to crit the same tick. You're therefore full of it when you say that a shaman does 2k-3k per tick with DoTs alone, just as you'd be full of it if you said that wizzies do 25k per nuke.
Hasrett said:You're off in the total number of ticks there. Gotta add the three ticks it takes to land the spells, plus potentially any lost ticks of a given DoT if you don't time the recasts right. Plus, any resist means a complete skewing of the timing, which will in turn spread out your DPS over an additional tick or more, further reducing the DPS.
Your assumption that everything is instant and goes perfectly is like a rogue assuming he hits every time with his BS. I highly recommend you try parsing it a few dozen times and seeing what kind of numbers you really come up with.
Thinkmeats said:400 AA rogues with IP/thaz loot parse at about 325 against weak-ish trash, so you can understand my surprise. How long can you sustain that?
Allielyn said:If you're referring to my extensive parses, keep in mind I did not bother to parse Max dps - a number of high atk buffs including savagery, giantkin, clicky atk rings, cotp, and blademaster were not used in those parses. I was looking at comparative dps - so long as they all had the same buffs, (and the same lack of buffs) then that was what was important.
Thinkmeats said:None of that has anything to do with what we're talking about, though. Unless there's an evil space wizard causing all the dust-collecting former-main shaman guild bots to appear, shamans clearly have some gameplay issues (NOT balance issues)--you should never really be required to bash the same spell over and over. See: necro manafeed, bard melody. That's not to mention the half-dozen or so other things brought up in this thread.
So no, that brief of a dismissal doesn't really address anything beyond the structure of the thread itself. That is, an unofficial discussion thread that's been muddied up by drive-bys. After all, you can't really expect a two-sentence post to easily refute a 650 word proposal. This thread got pretty chaotic; add to that a good amount of bleedthrough from the healing sleep thread and some irrelevant talk about bard songs and buff slots, and I don't really see much productive coming from this anymore.
If there's ever another thread made about this, I'll make it for my own proposal with all the information right in the first post for people too lazy to read the thread. Before that would happen, I'd get ahold of most of the active raid shammies and chat with them about it. Before that would happen, I'd have to have more free time than I do. So it'll be a while.