i just got the relic nuke for druids last night and i was a liltle disapointed with the stats
these are the 61+ druid nukes
flamestrike costs 365mana , the cast time is 3.0 seconds , 1378 dmg with no dmg inc and 1584 with dmg inc 5 (can be casted outside
wrath of the skies costs 395 mana , cast time is 3.3 seconds , 1678 dmg with no inc and 1953 with (cant be cast indoors)
relic:nightfire costs 370 mana cast time is 6 seconds and does 1687 with out dmg in and 1940 dmg with dmg inc 5(can be cast indoors)
from my understanding relics are ment to be spells that youd use mostly over other spells , but this nuke is twice the cast time of both of these and less dmg then wrath of the skies . someone made the argument that its better than flamestrike and wrath of the skies because it can be cast in doors , but tbh the only time a druid nukes usually if when their farming whichc is mostly outdoors , and when indoors as a druid in a group/raid your usually healing , ive never seen someone say catacombs group lf1m dps wiz necro mage or druid .
over all what im trying to say is that if its only "better" than a 64 spell because you can nuke indoors and its 25 mana less is that really worth making it a relic , because imo these spell should at least be beffed up so it would be used over wrath of the skies (64 nuke) instead of rotting in a spell book
imo the cast time is a liltle high and the dmg is a liltle low if it were somthing thing more like say 4-4.5 second cast for 2200-2400 dmg i think it would be alot more practacial .
(if this wasnt the right place to post this plz move)
thanks for listening
these are the 61+ druid nukes
flamestrike costs 365mana , the cast time is 3.0 seconds , 1378 dmg with no dmg inc and 1584 with dmg inc 5 (can be casted outside
wrath of the skies costs 395 mana , cast time is 3.3 seconds , 1678 dmg with no inc and 1953 with (cant be cast indoors)
relic:nightfire costs 370 mana cast time is 6 seconds and does 1687 with out dmg in and 1940 dmg with dmg inc 5(can be cast indoors)
from my understanding relics are ment to be spells that youd use mostly over other spells , but this nuke is twice the cast time of both of these and less dmg then wrath of the skies . someone made the argument that its better than flamestrike and wrath of the skies because it can be cast in doors , but tbh the only time a druid nukes usually if when their farming whichc is mostly outdoors , and when indoors as a druid in a group/raid your usually healing , ive never seen someone say catacombs group lf1m dps wiz necro mage or druid .
over all what im trying to say is that if its only "better" than a 64 spell because you can nuke indoors and its 25 mana less is that really worth making it a relic , because imo these spell should at least be beffed up so it would be used over wrath of the skies (64 nuke) instead of rotting in a spell book
imo the cast time is a liltle high and the dmg is a liltle low if it were somthing thing more like say 4-4.5 second cast for 2200-2400 dmg i think it would be alot more practacial .
(if this wasnt the right place to post this plz move)
thanks for listening