Allielyn
*Pony*
Actually, I think Fox's ad is one of the least "dirty" ads I've seen anywhere. My major concern was your posting of what appeared to me to be one line which misrepresented the issue. Of course both sides are guilty of attack ads. What I originally wrote really had little to do with this, though.
You wrote:
I feel that this misrepresents the issue. Believe me, if a cure to things like Parkinson's was absolutely guaranteed through stem cell research, then there wouldn't be any problem with funding, government involvement aside. Now, we may have just talked past each other, but when I say I promise something, that means it's guaranteed. I will do it. No ifs ands or buts.
Stem cell research IS promising. Which means to me, that there is a possibility that it can offer hope to many people with a variety of diseases. But there's no inherent guarantee. This is what I was arguing, because to me, you were saying that there IS an inherent guarantee of cures that will come through stem cell research.
Not that I meant to re-hash the same argument, but it appears we were talking past each other, and I felt the need to clarify the issue, since clearly you didn't understand my post. Perhaps it is merely an issue of semantics.
P.S. The last line was not intended to be an insult at all, nor was it an "embarrased bowing out." Believe me, if I was trying to be rude or condescending, I think you'd know it.
You wrote:
Stem Cell research . . promises a cure.
I feel that this misrepresents the issue. Believe me, if a cure to things like Parkinson's was absolutely guaranteed through stem cell research, then there wouldn't be any problem with funding, government involvement aside. Now, we may have just talked past each other, but when I say I promise something, that means it's guaranteed. I will do it. No ifs ands or buts.
Stem cell research IS promising. Which means to me, that there is a possibility that it can offer hope to many people with a variety of diseases. But there's no inherent guarantee. This is what I was arguing, because to me, you were saying that there IS an inherent guarantee of cures that will come through stem cell research.
Not that I meant to re-hash the same argument, but it appears we were talking past each other, and I felt the need to clarify the issue, since clearly you didn't understand my post. Perhaps it is merely an issue of semantics.
P.S. The last line was not intended to be an insult at all, nor was it an "embarrased bowing out." Believe me, if I was trying to be rude or condescending, I think you'd know it.