Are Golems considered Constructs?

In theory, golems should be flagged as constructs. De facto more then just a few of these are of humanoid or lesser elemental body type.
 
You can also ask your friendly neighborhood ranger or bard to tell you what the mob's actual body type is.
 
As far as I know golems tend to be the only things that are constructs, so I would hope that most of them are.
 
As far as I know golems tend to be the only things that are constructs, so I would hope that most of them are.

Then I'd like to inform those in charge the Enchanter unmaking curse does not work on any and all of the Kaezulian Golems. I tested it on every single golem type last night. /sadface
 
Then I'd like to inform those in charge the Enchanter unmaking curse does not work on any and all of the Kaezulian Golems. I tested it on every single golem type last night. /sadface

Hence, my 1st reply in this thread.
 
While they're called golems, flesh golems, bone golems, and ikisith golems really don't fit the construct bodytype because they're fleshy skeletons, skeletons, and elementals respectively. The things that are considered constructs are pretty much all large, heavy, stone made guardians.
 
While they're called golems, flesh golems, bone golems, and ikisith golems really don't fit the construct bodytype because they're fleshy skeletons, skeletons, and elementals respectively. The things that are considered constructs are pretty much all large, heavy, stone made guardians.

Like the ones in yclist who happen to be of the lesser elemental bodytype? It all makes sense now...
 
construct:
Verb - to build or form by putting together parts; frame; devise
Noun - something constructed
 
This was purely in regards if the golems were intended to be a construct coding wise (not what they look like)so that my enchanter curse would work on them.
 
As i see it the only reason to use unmaking is to make it so melee can crit on constructs which shouldnt matter if it isnt a construct
 
Back
Top Bottom