donfolstar3
Dalayan Master
From the Policy Plaza thread "Raid Encounter and 6 Man Content Rules"
it appears that someone changed:
and that it was done by a ghost:
Now I am not going to start tinfoiling about how this came on the heels of a claim dispute and who is in what guild because there are some problems here beyond that. Namely:
1. This change was done quieter than a ninja's fart. No announcement on the mainpage, no thread to discuss the change, and no documenting the change in the thread itself. Even if this is just a clarification of the rules it sure seems shady. Stop being shady.
2. This policy is stupid. Did the person who changed this every raid before? You gotta buff and sometimes when you zone raids get broken so you have to take time to reform. Should we be paranoid while all of that is happening? Inversely, if my raid zones in and nothing has been killed then running past that other raid to zerg something ASAP is following the rules? Really? What about zones where wiping on the first pull is a real possibility (Temple of Eleal, Sanctum, sometimes spires trash is buggy, etc...)? It just seems like this will must kill idea will butt heads with raid stalking and be trouble.
3. How about an ingame fix instead of more arbitrary and unclear rules posted on the forums? Specifically, how about putting a mob at the entrance to zones/wings that through a prompt or combat establishes claims through a completely incontrovertible method. Here are two ideas that may or may not work, but at least everyone would know what rules they were playing by:
FAQ
Q: I don't like this idea because it requires dev work!
A: That isn't a question, but I think in the long run it would require far less staff time to fix things once instead of consistently intervening.
Q: I don't like this idea because change is bad!
A: That also isn't a question, but since this is a change of a change I think you just vanished in a puff of logic so no worries.
Q: How dare you question authority!
A: Still not a question... which is weird because you seem to know what it means to question. Hey man, I'm fine with rules, but I like my rules transparent and objective ESPECIALLY when vested interests abound.
Q: Why?
A: Why not?
it appears that someone changed:
Right of Way-
To claim a wing/zone/encounter, you need 6 people present and be actively killing. Once you have begun clearing, if you stop and there is a dispute, you have 30 minutes to resume killing or you can lose your claim. If you enter a wing/zone/encounter and you DO NOT kill anything, YOU DO NOT have claim.
and that it was done by a ghost:
Last edit – 11/18/15 - Change in Bloodfires/Rohk policy
Last edited by a moderator: Thursday [11/26/15] at 2:52 AM"
Now I am not going to start tinfoiling about how this came on the heels of a claim dispute and who is in what guild because there are some problems here beyond that. Namely:
1. This change was done quieter than a ninja's fart. No announcement on the mainpage, no thread to discuss the change, and no documenting the change in the thread itself. Even if this is just a clarification of the rules it sure seems shady. Stop being shady.
2. This policy is stupid. Did the person who changed this every raid before? You gotta buff and sometimes when you zone raids get broken so you have to take time to reform. Should we be paranoid while all of that is happening? Inversely, if my raid zones in and nothing has been killed then running past that other raid to zerg something ASAP is following the rules? Really? What about zones where wiping on the first pull is a real possibility (Temple of Eleal, Sanctum, sometimes spires trash is buggy, etc...)? It just seems like this will must kill idea will butt heads with raid stalking and be trouble.
3. How about an ingame fix instead of more arbitrary and unclear rules posted on the forums? Specifically, how about putting a mob at the entrance to zones/wings that through a prompt or combat establishes claims through a completely incontrovertible method. Here are two ideas that may or may not work, but at least everyone would know what rules they were playing by:
Friendly Mob of Claiming [name needs work]
Hail FMoC and FMoC does something similar to ToT porting system when it counts flags to offer or deny porting rights. If FMoC counts 6 or more lvl 65 characters it offers a prompt which makes a log record of the claim and will inform the next person to hail it exactly when that claim was established and by whom. No room for arguing or GM interpretation or any other crap- FMoC clearly states that Sir Dyldo of the guild Fanny Packs established this claim 26 minutes ago so they have 4 minutes to kill something.
Mean Mob of Claiming [name is absolute perfection]
MMoC sits at the entrance to wings/zones and is green, nonagressive, melees for almost nothing, has golem raid trash hps, and does an AoE for:
(6 - [# of people on aggro list]) * 1,000,000 unresistable damage every two ticks
Killing MMoC establishes a claim. If you want to take your four friends into a zone to kill under tier stuff that is fine, but you either cannot establish a claim or you need to drag some newbs to work (which you should be doing for rots anyway you monster).
Hail FMoC and FMoC does something similar to ToT porting system when it counts flags to offer or deny porting rights. If FMoC counts 6 or more lvl 65 characters it offers a prompt which makes a log record of the claim and will inform the next person to hail it exactly when that claim was established and by whom. No room for arguing or GM interpretation or any other crap- FMoC clearly states that Sir Dyldo of the guild Fanny Packs established this claim 26 minutes ago so they have 4 minutes to kill something.
Mean Mob of Claiming [name is absolute perfection]
MMoC sits at the entrance to wings/zones and is green, nonagressive, melees for almost nothing, has golem raid trash hps, and does an AoE for:
(6 - [# of people on aggro list]) * 1,000,000 unresistable damage every two ticks
Killing MMoC establishes a claim. If you want to take your four friends into a zone to kill under tier stuff that is fine, but you either cannot establish a claim or you need to drag some newbs to work (which you should be doing for rots anyway you monster).
FAQ
Q: I don't like this idea because it requires dev work!
A: That isn't a question, but I think in the long run it would require far less staff time to fix things once instead of consistently intervening.
Q: I don't like this idea because change is bad!
A: That also isn't a question, but since this is a change of a change I think you just vanished in a puff of logic so no worries.
Q: How dare you question authority!
A: Still not a question... which is weird because you seem to know what it means to question. Hey man, I'm fine with rules, but I like my rules transparent and objective ESPECIALLY when vested interests abound.
Q: Why?
A: Why not?