Relic DS

C

Clue

Dalayan Adventurer
Hey, just wondering why the magicians relic damage shield is for 48 and adds 40 fire resist and the druids relic damage shield is 45 and no resist, could the druids damage shield maybe get some disease or poison resist added to it!?
 
Clue said:
Hey, just wondering why the magicians relic damage shield is for 48 and adds 40 fire resist and the druids relic damage shield is 45 and no resist, could the druids damage shield maybe get some disease or poison resist added to it!?
Click to expand...

I Think druid DS adds a little ac.


EDIT: I was wrong.
 
That's simply because Mage DS is supposed to be better. Just like Aego gives more hps/ac than natureskin, or why Enchanter's haste is better than Shaman's.
 
Also you cant really compare them like that.... kind of like saying "well why doesnt my warrior get a DS spell!" Two entirely different classes with majorly different spells.... lets give mages Words of Completion and Ancient: Nature's Soothing while we're at it.
 
Yeah I guess but would adding disease or poison resist be unbalancing, don't druids have better DS then mages up until there relic DS, seems kinda weird.
 
Clue said:
Yeah I guess but would adding disease or poison resist be unbalancing, don't druids have better DS then mages up until there relic DS, seems kinda weird.
Click to expand...

Mage DS is always better. By only a couple points but it is.
 
Druid and mages are pretty close up until the later levels where druids gets better, and then mages conquers druids ds with their relic one.
 
Raherin said:
Druid and mages are pretty close up until the later levels where druids gets better, and then mages conquers druids ds with their relic one.
Click to expand...

NEIN!



Mage DS is always better. Always.
 
Its just that usually a druid with relic DS is easier to find then a mage with relic ds :p thats why u see druid ds' being used to much!


ofcourse its total bullshit what i just wrote, but i like to pretent that my relic DS is usefull =P
 
kineldar said:
Raherin said:
Druid and mages are pretty close up until the later levels where druids gets better, and then mages conquers druids ds with their relic one.
Click to expand...

NEIN!



Mage DS is always better. Always.
Click to expand...

Mages damage shields from 60 to 65:

Aegis of Tarhyl
Classes: Magician: 60
Effects: Damage Shield by -33(L1-65)
Increase Resist Fire by 30(L1-65)

Relic: Cupola of Incineration
Classes: Magician: 65
Effects: Damage Shield by -48(L1-65)
Increase Resist Fire by 40(L1-65)

Druids damage shield from 60 to 65:

Shield of Spines
Classes: Druid: 61
Effects: Damage Shield by -35(L1-65)

Legacy of Spine
Classes: Druid: 64
Effects: Damage Shield by -35(L1-65)

Relic: Legacy of Blades
Classes: Druid: 65
Effects: Damage Shield by -45(L1-65)

Raherin said:
Druid and mages are pretty close up until the later levels where druids gets better (level 61 to 64 (I didn't think I had to name the exact levels, but ok) ;)), and then mages conquers druids ds with their relic one.
Click to expand...

As you can see, mages have no damage shield spell from level 60 until 65, thus making a druid have a better damage shield than a mage from level 61 to 64.
 
Raherin said:
kineldar said:
Raherin said:
Druid and mages are pretty close up until the later levels where druids gets better, and then mages conquers druids ds with their relic one.
Click to expand...

NEIN!



Mage DS is always better. Always.
Click to expand...

Mages damage shields from 60 to 65:

Aegis of Tarhyl
Classes: Magician: 60
Effects: Damage Shield by -33(L1-65)
Increase Resist Fire by 30(L1-65)

Relic: Cupola of Incineration
Classes: Magician: 65
Effects: Damage Shield by -48(L1-65)
Increase Resist Fire by 40(L1-65)

Druids damage shield from 60 to 65:

Shield of Spines
Classes: Druid: 61
Effects: Damage Shield by -35(L1-65)

Legacy of Spine
Classes: Druid: 64
Effects: Damage Shield by -35(L1-65)

Relic: Legacy of Blades
Classes: Druid: 65
Effects: Damage Shield by -45(L1-65)

Raherin said:
Druid and mages are pretty close up until the later levels where druids gets better (level 61 to 64 (I didn't think I had to name the exact levels, but ok) ;)), and then mages conquers druids ds with their relic one.
Click to expand...




As you can see, mages have no damage shield spell from level 60 until 65, thus making a druid have a better damage shield than a mage from level 61 to 64. A level 61-64 druid will have a better DS than a level 60-64 mage.
Click to expand...

Mage DS is better.... it has a built in uber FR buff... so the 1-3 points of dmg lost is made up in resists! MAGE IS BETTER MAGE WIN DRUID LOSE
 
I'm talking about pure damage. The resist is only useful against a mob that deals fire damage, which isn't more common than straight up melee mobs. So no, druids DS is better from level 61-64, kkthx.
 
I agree with Kinelder, I'd take the fire resist over damage any day of the week. The damage difference won't be bigger than your groups dps over 5 seconds.
 
Right. Raherin is right as much as it pains me inside to say that. The extra dmg from the druid DS makes more of a differnce than you think, more so for pally/sk tanks because a DS makes up a large portion of our dps! If the mobs arent casting spells that check FR why bother with it go with more dmg and kill faster. It only makes sense unless we are in Kineldar Land again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom