first of all, emotions play better than issues. that's a political reality, so in the winner-take-all control of the most powerful organization on the planet, yes, they are playing to win. the reason? because that's what people want, and in a democracy, people get what the want (and often what they deserve).
and yes, a democrat should tear down a republican for being a republican. that's the reality of the two party system. furthermore, republicans are notoriously disciplined in how they vote and caucus. for this reason, there is no such thing as a "pro choice" republican or an "anti war" republican, because when it comes down to the vote, they vote with their party. just the political reality.
and the difference between OSB and coffins is the fact that US soldiers are really dying every day as a direct result of republican governance. (also, show me the ad with the coffins - or did i miss it?) - keep in mind the same republicans lead the run up, execution and post-war occupation. the same republicans that royally screwed up post-war by using political allegiance ahead of qualifications, (
Ties to GOP Trumped Know-How Among Staff Sent to Rebuild Iraq ; WaPo 9/17/06 A1) at one point sending a 24 yr old loyalist, with no background in economics to reopen the baghdad stock exchange. just one example, skim the article and be amazed, like the health administrator that wants to focus on anti-smoking campaigns while people are literally being blown to bits.
in contrast ..
democrats are not enabling OSB or giving him a better opportunity to strike america. there is no fact to their assertion- but try to tell me american troops are not dying in iraq because of republicans.
in fact, according to our own NIE (national intelligence estimate) gathered by the top intelligence agencies in our country, the Iraq war is making al qaeda as an ideological movement stronger. in fact, we are losing the war in afghanistan and the top commanders in both iraq and afghanistan have said troops in iraq distract from the war on terrorism and that we are on the brink of losing afghanistan entirely and seeing a resurgence of the taliban and alqaeda in the southern region. (
Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terrorism Threat ; NYT 9/24/06 ) , (
British army chief urges pullout from Iraq ; Reuters, 10/13/06) , (
Top generals say U.S. troops' presence may fuel insurgency Seattle Times, 10/01/05) , (
NATO chief warns Afghans may switch allegiance to Taliban CNN , 10/08/06)
so to pretend that george bush being morphed into nixon is "very borderline obsene content in advertisements for politiacl gain", as much as saying, "Vote Bush or Osama wins" shows you cannot find meaningful distinction between fact and fantasy, which is all the republicans are trying to do.
the point is: they are trying to do "well both sides do it, both sides are corrupt" as they up the ante and break all the rules time and time again. don't even tell me both sides are just as corrupt, because that makes no sense since the democrats have not been in power in congress in over a decade. don't even try to pretend that the democrats have nearly the power to abuse that the republicans do and have abused. all it shows it that you do not really follow politics and names like abramahoff, ney, cunningham, delay, corker, allen and boatloads of others mean nothing to you.
by the way,
here is the Official Iraq War ad of the DNC - now try to tell me how far from reality that ad is?
