Don't listen to scientists. CO² emissions = LIFE

[vertizor]

For those of you who didn't see AN Inconenient Truth - yes ... haha, it's Al Gore presenting this. Does that make it less true? No.

There's a particularly alarming piece of information in his presentation - a graph of C02 levels, for iirc the last 600,000 years. He shows how temperature trends follow C02 levels for all that time. He also shows that current C02 levels are about twice as high now as ANY TIME IN THE LAST 600,000 YEARS. I think that's extremely telling, that we are having a major impact on the world's environment - this is not just a natural cycle. Go see the movie.

 

[Gea]

What I find to be interesting: do you guys REALLY need to see a movie in cinema to believe what you could see right outside your doors IF YOU JUST OPENED YOUR EYES?

Is TV and cinema the only source of "information" in the US of A? Is your internet censored? Or could you see the truth with just a bit of RESEARCH?

The impact of greenhous gases isn't "small" in any way. It is HUGE, and it has played a huge role in every climate change in the earth's history. But there has never been such huge amounts of them set free artificially.

We will survive this, yes. But not all of us, and our lifes will change.

 

[Caoimhe]

Armando, while I will not dispute the accuracy of Science, nowhere did it say that 0% of peer-reviewed published journals say it isn't true. What it said that no journals published by groups "in the United States whose members' expertise bears directly on the matter have issued similar statements". Just thought I would clear that up, since those that caught that point may look at your arguements as a little less convincing.

Personally, I want to see journals from from scientific bodies from other countries and international groups whose members' expertise is directly related to the subject. I am not saying that global warming isn't real (it is) or severe (it definitely may be), but I think it is overdramatised here, regardless of it's actual severity.