Baldakan and linked mobs

[nikosk]

Even if they don't make it easier to get, Baldakan needs some re-balancing to make it worth the pain in the ass it is. Less linked-mobs, longer respawn time, more pp and drops from mobs. It could still take just as long to get, and actually be a worthwhile experience and be done without a headache and frustration.

 

[Otcho]

Baldakos is basically the heartland undercaverns of ikisith

 

[Glamrin]

Baldakan camp is no doubt a pain, but I think it's fine as is, otherwise the spell will become trivial. If the named can be done by 1 or 2 average groups, every 65's and their alts will have runics in a month or 2. Runics are suppose to be hard to get, let's keep it that way. However it'd be nice if some of the class runics could be changed to be somewhat more useful, nor should I say not usleess? For example I still can't find 1 reason to mem my wizard's. Can runics be a litter better for the time/effort required to obtain?

so you're telling me you think it's fine that a bard can do his runic all on his own with two characters, while some classes needs 2 - 3 groups? How is it ok that it's "trivial" (it really isnt because of other things otcho mentioned) for some classes and very difficult for others?

Anyways Im not really asking for the nameds as such to be made easier, however I would like it a lil easier to kill trash in order to make the nameds spawn. At the very least Id like baldakan to be looked over since the differences for different classes are so big.

 

[Anti Eh]

Well bards only get 1 mob to cycle, and 0 mobs to kill for rust code... while other classes can cycle single pull roamers to get there named to spawn via rust code..

Sure might be a easier camp but it def has the potential to be a longer camp.