I'm using XP pro, and after installing .Net, I now have to select the default user account (no other accounts are listed) to finish logging in to Windows. When I go to Control Panel and Users, I have an "ASP.NET Machine Account".
Any ideas WHY this happened, and more importantly HOW TO GET RID OF IT?
Even worse, after installing .Net, when I try to run wrpatcher.exe, I get "wrpatcher.exe is not a valid Win32 application". I rebooted after installing .Net, same error message. So, I uninstalled the program, re-downloaded it, reinstalled it, same message. So in short, the patcher isn't working for me.
I felt very uncomfortable that during the installation of .Net, I got 2 warnings from ZoneAlarm that dllhost.exe asked for access to the Internet, and msdtc.exe asked for both access and server rights. Can these applications safely be denied? I allowed them for now, but I do not like having applications running on my machine with server rights - THAT is a security hole begging to be abused.
All in all, IMHO - this version of the patcher is faulty in it's methodology. I'm sure .Net is a fine to program to work with, but don't make us suffer with jumping through hoops and doing software backflips to make it easier for the delivery of this program. It's a minor program, I'm sure there MUST have been an easier way to write it.
But since it looks like we are "stuck" with it for now, how can I fix these issues?
Any ideas WHY this happened, and more importantly HOW TO GET RID OF IT?
Even worse, after installing .Net, when I try to run wrpatcher.exe, I get "wrpatcher.exe is not a valid Win32 application". I rebooted after installing .Net, same error message. So, I uninstalled the program, re-downloaded it, reinstalled it, same message. So in short, the patcher isn't working for me.
I felt very uncomfortable that during the installation of .Net, I got 2 warnings from ZoneAlarm that dllhost.exe asked for access to the Internet, and msdtc.exe asked for both access and server rights. Can these applications safely be denied? I allowed them for now, but I do not like having applications running on my machine with server rights - THAT is a security hole begging to be abused.
All in all, IMHO - this version of the patcher is faulty in it's methodology. I'm sure .Net is a fine to program to work with, but don't make us suffer with jumping through hoops and doing software backflips to make it easier for the delivery of this program. It's a minor program, I'm sure there MUST have been an easier way to write it.
But since it looks like we are "stuck" with it for now, how can I fix these issues?