well, then what is the point now of an iksar necro if they cannot gain the benifits of their regen while standing? back when i first started, i heard iksars have a bonus regen of around 12 standing at lvl 65 (even if it was only half that i would still have created an iksar). that was the ONE and only reason i picked an iksar over a darkelf or erudite, faster regen and losing less HP's while casting spells while in lich form. i sacrificed intelligence for regeneration and now it seems broken to me. whats the point now of starting with a 110 int iksar when you can start with a 134 or 142 int "without racial regen" Darkelf or Erudite?
At 65, my base standing regeneration should not be only 2hp's a tick.
in my last post where i was talking about call of bones, i did not mean that because i lose hps now standing with call of bones on that regeneration should be looked at, i was just noteing the change.
i was also showing the lack of regeneration while FD in that i only gained back special effect regen (recovery + AA regen) but no base regen.
that is why i was calling for regeneration to be looked at.
*edit, just saw the post about iksars and trolls being 2hp regen while all others have 1hp regen. i don't see how 24-32 int is worth 1hp/tick regen and extra ac. also about regen effects, does this mean that sitting creates gains back x4 now instead of "Doubled Effects," because thats what it seems like now. standing i gain back 8, sitting i gain back 32, which is 4x8*