Lucrezia
Dalayan Adventurer
Druids have a line of fire-based DoT spells that also include an AC debuff, and with later upgrades, an FR debuff. The highest spell in this line is 52's Breath of Tarhyl.
Another line of fire-based spells includes an AC debuff, an attack debuff, and with later upgrades, an FR debuff. They deal a small amount of initial damage (~250 with Enclosure of Tarhyl), and there's an Archaic version that reduces healing the target takes, if I recall correctly.
These two lines do not stack. I could be incorrect and these two lines are considered the same, but the differences in effects and damage seems to say otherwise. Could these spell lines be made to stack, or altered so they can? Without two lines of DoT (the first being the Insects line), druid damage is negatively impacted; without a FR debuff, landing the DoT and fire-based damage can be difficult. The DoT is substantially more mana-costly than the one-time spells. The one-time overwrites the DoT, but not the other way around.
Could this be looked at, or perhaps explained?
Another line of fire-based spells includes an AC debuff, an attack debuff, and with later upgrades, an FR debuff. They deal a small amount of initial damage (~250 with Enclosure of Tarhyl), and there's an Archaic version that reduces healing the target takes, if I recall correctly.
These two lines do not stack. I could be incorrect and these two lines are considered the same, but the differences in effects and damage seems to say otherwise. Could these spell lines be made to stack, or altered so they can? Without two lines of DoT (the first being the Insects line), druid damage is negatively impacted; without a FR debuff, landing the DoT and fire-based damage can be difficult. The DoT is substantially more mana-costly than the one-time spells. The one-time overwrites the DoT, but not the other way around.
Could this be looked at, or perhaps explained?
syduck: guess as to how many druids have " the druid archaic which increases fire damage to the mob" on the server?