Or maybe they will ignore both of them =P.
Sorry, but I am not a big fan of the current buglist.
Here's some constructive criticism, devs:
If you are going to take the time to go read the list, and then move it from one list to the closed/dismissed list and edit it to be one of those 2 types of outcomes - why not include a simple line or 2 of why it was resolved the way it was?
I've buglisted a few items and in all cases it came out dismissed or closed. Yeah, closed means its 'fixed' - perhaps in some internal ongoing dev version. But at the time of the "closed" entry and for a patch or three since then, the bug I listed wasn't fixed in any fashion on WR. And 2 or more other issues were both value and reproducable and y'all listed them as "dismissed".
Fine. Its a free server to me. It's not my time correcting these bugs. /shrug. Keep it the same. I just figured that since whomever was already editing the buglist, they could do everyone a favor (and limit the other forum spam/traffic from confused or irate folks) by simply listing a bit of the reasoning on the outcome.